49th UPR Working Group: Key highlights
From the 28th of April to the 9th of May, the United Nations Human Rights Council hosted the 49th session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group.
The 14 States under Review (SuR) during this session were Armenia, Grenada, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Spain, Sweden and Türkiye.
The session saw a total of 3,720 recommendations put forth by recommending States. The most frequently, the recommendations concerned the protection of women’s, children and migrant’s rights, right to education, civil liberties, gender-based violence, ratification of international instruments, abolition of death penalty and torture and operationalization or creation of a National human rights institution (NHRI).
On average, States received 266 recommendations. Among the States with the highest number of recommendations were Kenya (339) and Türkiye (334). 10 out of 14 countries have decided to postpone their position on the recommendations received, which is a good practice that allows for national consultations to be conducted.

See detailed information by country below.
Good Practices
The UPR process promotes open and honest dialogue among peers to monitor and improve human rights conditions around the world. As the UPR also serves as a platform for the exchange of good practices among states, UPR Info has highlighted three initiatives from States under Review, among others, that could inspire other UN Member States.
Spain
In 2023, Spain submitted a mid-term report detailing the implementation of the recommendations accepted during its previous UPR, and contributed to the preparation of its national report. The national report included a summary table (Annex 1) indicating the degree of implementation of the recommendations in 2020, as well as their alignment with SDGs of the 2030 Agenda. To prepare this report, Spain established an interministerial coordination process involving relevant ministries, the Ombudsman, and civil society. A formal consultation with civil society organizations was held from 6 September to 1 October 2024, followed by the submission of the draft report in December to enable stakeholders to provide comments and feedback.
Kenya
Kenya stood out for the development of a 2021–2025 implementation plan, which grouped the recommendations by thematic areas. This plan detailed the tasks to be completed, monitoring indicators, the responsible actors, and the timelines for implementation. The coordination of this process was overseen by the National Committee on International and Regional Human Rights Obligations, a permanent body responsible for reporting. This committee includes representatives from relevant ministries, national human rights institutions, and the Ministry of Economic Planning, ensuring alignment with the SDGs. The national report was prepared through an inclusive consultation process involving Parliament, the judiciary, county governments, ministries, civil society, and technical partners such as the OHCHR, UNDP, and NGOs specialized in human rights.
Lesotho
The National Mechanism for Reporting and Follow-up (NMRF) in Lesotho, coordinated by the Human Rights Service of the Ministry of Law and Justice, led the preparation of several reports relating to key international human rights treaties (CEDAW, CRC, CRPD, and CMW). The NMRF's mandate allows for the co-option of additional stakeholders depending on the report being prepared. A sub-committee of the Mechanism was responsible for drafting the mid-term report, under the guidance of the Secretariat. However, the delegation noted that the functioning of the NMRF faces institutional challenges, such as a lack of commitment from certain members and their non-rotation, which hampers progress and the timely completion of state party reports. To improve its effectiveness, additional training opportunities were deemed necessary.