51st UPR Working Group: Key highlights
From the 19th of January to the 30th of January 2026, the United Nations Human Rights Council hosted the 51st session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group.
The 13 states scheduled for review during this session were Australia, Austria, Georgia, Lebanon, Mauritania, the Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Nepal, Oman, Rwanda, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, and Sao Tomé and Principe.
The session saw a total of 3,209 recommendations put forth by recommending States. With the highest frequency of mention, were the topics of women’s rights and equality, gender-based violence, freedom of the press and freedom of expression, access to universal education, the rights of migrants and asylum-seekers, anti-discrimination legislation, resilience against climate change, and the relevance of National human rights institutions.
On average, States received 247 recommendations. Among the States with the highest number of recommendations were Australia (332) and Georgia (307), and the State with the lowest number was Micronesia (162).
There were three other states that received below 200 recommendations; all of which were island states: Nauru (176), Saint Kitts and Nevis (190) and Saint Lucia (198). Finally, all 13 countries have decided to postpone their position on the recommendations received, stating a response will be submitted no later than the sixty-second session of the HRC. This is a good practice that allows for national consultations to be conducted, with Belarus being the only state who has made their position available.
Countries Reviewed
Highlights from the countries reviewed at UPR Working Group 51.
Good Practices
The UPR process promotes transparent and constructive peer dialogue on how States participate in and make effective use of the review mechanism. UPR Info has identified three examples of good practices in engaging with the UPR process, with the aim of fostering exchange and inspiring other UN Member States in their own approach to the mechanism.
Nepal
The preparation of the national report by the Committee constituted by the Human Rights and International Treaty Division of the Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers was carried out through nationwide multi-tier consultations involving federal ministries, Parliament, judiciary, justice and security sector institutions, provincial and local governments, constitutional commissions, and civil society organisations.
Australia
Established an inter-institutional coordination framework led by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with support from the Attorney General’s Office and Ministry of Justice, to oversee implementation, reporting and follow-up to UPR recommendations and other international human rights obligations. Through its National Mechanism for Implementation, Reporting and Follow-Up, the State consolidates recommendations from UPR cycles, treaty bodies, special procedures and regional mechanisms into a structured system with clear leadership, focal points and tracking tools, promoting coherence and accountability despite capacity constraints.
Austria
For the first time, the Austrian delegation to the UPR WG session included representatives of local and regional governments, and namely representatives of the City of Vienna Human Rights Office and of the State of Carinthia Ethnic Groups Office and Human Rights. This is a good practice in line with the HRC Resolution 57/12, encouraging States to to promote the engagement of local governments in the work of regional and international human rights mechanisms.